Enter Username
Custom Classroom Resources will not be available after August 1st, 2008.

If you would like to access resources you have created for future use, you will need to save them to your local computer.
favorites

YSC HomeAccept the ChallengeFinalists & WinnersNewsExtrasScience in ActionAlumni
Finalists & Winners
2006 Finalists

Click on each name to learn more about the finalists and their projects!

Muhammad Abu-Rmaileh

Russell Babb

Colleen Cambier

Alyssa Chan

Evan Cofer

Kayson Conlin

Alyssa Cook

Samantha Gonzalez

Erik Gustafson

Catherine Haber

Joshua Hammer

John Douglas Haswell

Connor Ivens

Brigg Jannuzi

Bethany Johnson

Rohit Kamat

Gokul Krishnan

Matthew Lepow

Collin McAliley

Morgan Monroe

Matthew Mooney

Christopher Mowers

Prithwis Mukhopadhyay

Matthew Nanni

Shubha Raghvendra

Keshav Ramaswami

Jaron Shalom Rottman-Yang

Laurie Rumker

Rick Schaffer

Brandon Shih

Ambrose Soehn

Benjamin Song

Karl Sorensen

Catherine Soto

Katherine Strube

Amy Tang

Kyrillos Tawadros

Prem Thottumkara

Darby Woodard

Danielle Zapata

Banner Graphic
Shubha plays piano and finds the intertwining of math and music astounding. She also plays basketball and likes the strategy involved in this team sport. She aspires to become a cardiologist because she says, "it's amazing to me how something the size of my fist can keep people alive every second."
Project Graphic
How does the brain process misspelled or scrambled words? Shubha learned that such puzzles are solved at four levels—by clues provided by discourse (context), syntax, semantics, and phonology. Shubha devised a test of scrambled words in which some of these clues were available and others not. She hypothesized that proper context would provide the greatest benefit for word analysis.
 
Shubha devised nine trials in which participants had to unscramble five words. Two trials assessed the role of phonology by requiring participants to unscramble words that had the first sound intact or the first and last intact. The context trials used scrambled words in a paragraph or sentence. The syntax trials had scrambled words as part of a nonsensical sentence or paragraph. The semantics trials featured scrambled words with the first letter intact or first and last intact. A control trial had only scrambled words with no clues. Shubha found that volunteers scored best with phonological clues, unscrambling words with sounds intact. A close second were scores in the trials using scrambled words in context.
 

Tell Us What You Think
 
YSC Home • Accept the Challenge • Finalists & WinnersNews • ExtrasScience in ActionAlumni